
Potluck from Hell[1]
(Eucharist from Hell)
I
heard a sermon by the Bishop Reverend Dr. Yvette Flunder. I am using
a major theme she used in her sermon, but much of the content is
different. Yvette Flunder is a fairly powerful speaker, so she might
not appreciate any of the credit I am giving her, especially when the
content is vastly different than her sermon.
Introduction:
During
the apostle Paul's life, there were many divisions in the ancient
world. The Roman Empire may
have had elements of multiculturalism, but there was not a lot of
respect for diversity. People in one segment of society tended to
look down on others. Just a few of the social divisions in society
included:
·
free people and slaves
·
Greeks and those Greeks thought were
“barbarians”
·
Jews and Gentiles
·
Roman citizens and people considered to be
“lesser breeds”
·
Cultured and “ignorant”[2]
The
church, however, was different, The early Christian church was one of
the few places in the ancient world where the social walls of society
were gone.[3]
William Barclay cites a church historian as saying the Government of
the Roman Empire was
“baffled” by how the early Christian church had solved so
many social problems.[4]
The
early Christian church was liberal, wildly liberal. It was liberal
enough to make many Christians today feel rather uncomfortable. Some
of the progressive accomplishments of the early church included
giving women a better role, abolishing begging, giving dignity to
laborers, and reducing some of the extremes of slavery. A historian
credits the wonderful social reforms within Christian circles to the
communion service.[5]
Remembering the cross of Calvary helps us break down barriers that
society has created, because we come to see all people as equal in
the Messiah and as being equally worthy of God's love and of our
love.
Unfortunately,
the church on Corinth was
not really a good example of the progressive social reforms that were
present in the early Christian church. There were some rather serious
problems in the Corinthian church. You may want to open your Bibles
to 1 Corinthians chapter 11, so we can look at one of those problems.
1
Corinthians 11:17 – 34.
Your worship services do
you more harm than good. I am certainly not going to praise you for
this. 18I
am told that you can't get along with each other when you worship,
and I am sure that some of what I have heard is true. 19You
are bound to argue with each other, but it is easy to see which of
you have God's approval. 20When
you meet together, you don't really celebrate the Lord's Supper.
21You even start eating before
everyone gets to the meeting, and some of you go hungry, while others
get drunk. 22Don't you have
homes where you can eat and drink? Do you hate God's church? Do you
want to embarrass people who don't have anything? What can I say to
you? I certainly cannot praise you.
23I have already told you what the Lord Jesus did on the night he was
betrayed. And it came from the Lord himself. He took some bread in
his hands. 24Then after he
had given thanks, he broke it and said, "This
is my body, which is given for you. Eat this and remember me."
25After the meal, Jesus took a cup of wine in his hands and said,
"This is my blood, and
with it God makes his new agreement with you. Drink this and remember
me."
26The Lord meant that when you eat this bread and drink from this cup, you tell
about his death until he comes. 27But
if you eat the bread and drink the wine in a way that isn't worthy of
the Lord, you sin against his body and blood. 28That's
why you must examine the way you eat and drink. 29If
you fail to understand that you are the body of the Lord, you will
condemn yourselves by the way you eat and drink.
30That's why
many of you are sick and weak and why a lot of others have died.
31If we
carefully judge ourselves, we won't be punished. 32But
when the Lord judges and punishes us, he does it to keep us from
being condemned with the rest of the world.
33My dear friends, you should wait until everyone gets there before you start
eating. 34If
you really are hungry, you can eat at home. Then you won't condemn
yourselves when you meet together. After I arrive, I will instruct
you about the other matters.
What
is the worst potluck you've attended, the potluck from hell? I recall
hearing of one that must have made some kind of a record. The church
had a bean potluck. Everybody brought a bean dish. One of the bean
dishes had food poisoning and a bunch of people in the church got
sick. Beans was a word to never be mentioned in that church!
I
recall being invited to a small church. I was told there was a
potluck, but was specifically told not to bring anything. So I did
not bring anything. I got there to discover that, contrary to what I
had been told, there was not enough food. An ant would have starved
to death on the total food there.
There
is a third potluck I think was from hell. A few of us were headed off
to a Christian concert – a free one. Free concerts are always
the best. Some of the food was not conducive to going to an indoors
concert. I will not comment more.
The
Corinthian potluck was a potluck from hell in ways that might even
make these other potlucks seem good. I know that seems like a bit of
a stretch, but reflect on the text and I think you will understand.
This
was the Agape or Love Feast.[6]
Some love feast! Warren Wiersbe indicates the agape feast could have
been an “opportunity for edification.” Instead, the
agape feast was a time of embarrassment.[7]
So
what made the potluck “Love Feast” a time of
embarrassment? Verse 18 talks about there being divisions or groups.
One can almost get the picture of informal groups forming during the
potluck love feast, with each group in a different room of the home.
Each room with people of a different background.[8]
And very little mixing among the classes of people. The poor might
have been eating in the yard, while the rich were inside.[9]
Here
part of what might have been taking place. The slaves and the poor
laborers could not get away from work early.[10]
By the time
they got to the meal all of the good stuff was gone. For the slaves,
this might have been their chance at the only really good meal they
could get all week.
The
result was some people were going hungry, while others ate a lot of
food. Some people were getting drunk, while others were going
hungry.[11]
Warren
Wiersbe makes a valid point. Regarding this passage, he says, “When
you abuse believers who are less fortunate than you are, then you are
actually despising the church!”[12]
I take it one step beyond what Warren Wiersbe notes. When we abuse
other believers, we are abusing the body of Christ. Abusing the body
of Christ is really abusing Christ. “Inasmuch as ye have done
it unto of the least of these my brethern, ye have done it unto
me.[13]
And
this was not just any old potluck. The Love Feast was communion. At
that time in the church, communion was not a small symbolic meal, as
we have. They ate an actual meal.[14]
A meal to celebrate the inclusion of humanity by God's grace was
being used to exclude people. This was a mockery of communion.[15]
Authentic remembering imitates Christ.[16]
Little about
their meal imitated Christ.
Remember,
this meal was communion. What the Corinthian church was doing showed
very poor theology. Their practice showed that the gospel was only
for the rich and the privileged and that God's grace did not extend
to the poor and marginalized groups of society.
There
are some important questions on which we need to reflect. Who goes
hungry in our church? For whom are we unwilling to wait? Who are the
Gentiles, the uncivilized in our community? As a gay church, as gay
believers, do we make straight people go hungry? Are the beauty
challenged, the designer label challenged going hungry? Do we let
those who are not as well educated, those who do not share our
political view eat?
Verse
19. The Good News Bible seems to get to the heart of the meaning very
quickly. No
doubt there must be divisions among you so that the ones who are in
the right may be clearly seen. Yvette
Flunder feels divisions are present in the church so we can see who
is genuine and who is not. Because of the divisions, we can see who
is an authentic believer. [17]
She
makes a good point. There will always be economic, racial, political,
sexual orientation, gender identification, and ethnic differences in
churches. We cannot eliminate those distinctions. But how we treat
those who are different than we are proves how genuine our faith is.
Those who magnify differences, and use differences as an excuse to
mistreat others are not walking in the Spirit. People who have arms
long enough to reach past the differences and touch hearts are
walking fully in the Spirit.
Paul
says they are to tarry or wait for one another. The principle was
that in the church there is only one table. The table is common for
rich and poor. The rich have no priority over the poor.[18]
That
means we must tarry or wait for those who differ from us
·
Ethnically
·
Racially
·
Socially
·
Economically
·
Politically
·
Theologically[19]
·
Sexually
Like
the church of
Corinth, there are times when the modern church of
Christ damages
the cause of Christ. Yvette Flunder says we need a save Jesus
campaign, because the reputation of Christ has been marred by those
who claim to represent Christ, while the marginalize others.
When
I think of wait for one another, I think of what a waiter or a
waitress does. They wait on another. To wait on another in one
respect could mean to serve another person.
For
a number of years, I took a senior citizen to church every week. The
trip to was an hour each way, so there was plenty of time to visit.
There were weeks when that was a very enjoyable task. A few weeks, it
was an not as pleasant. After a few years, we almost became family.
One
weekend, she taught me something very important, something every man,
especially every young man needs to know. She wanted to go to the
mall to buy something. We went from store, to store, to store.
Nothing. The day was wasted. On the way home, I felt rather
frustrated. And she was happy as a lark. She had a relaxing trip to
the city, enjoyed seeing all of the stores in a large mall. Young men
are so goal oriented that they tend to forget the more what is more
important. We spend most of our time getting to the destination, so
enjoying the trip is just as important as enjoying the destination.
That day a little grandma taught me that the trip is very important!
Yvette
Flunder tells a neat story. There was a race. A group of children
were in race. One of the boys in the race fell. All of the children
did something probably nobody would have expected. They stopped
running. And they waited for him to catch up. When he caught up, they
locked hands together and walked across the finish line –
together. And I am sure the competitive athletes would ask the
question, “Who won the race?” Everybody won the race.
They all won, because they waited for one another.” [20]
When
we wait on others, we are all winners. So wait on another.
Prayer:
Lord,
give us the courage to reach out, to reach past differences, so we
can wait on one another.
Amen.
[1]Yvette
Flunder used the term Potluck from Hell in her sermon.
Cathedral of Hope. September 18, 2005.
[2]William
Barclay. The Daily Study Bible: The
Letter to the Corinthians. Revised Ed.
(Burlington, Ontario: G.R. Welch, 1975), 101.
[3]Barclay,
101.
[4]Barclay,
101.
[5]Barclay,
101, cites the historian as saying, lifted the woman to her rightful
place and drawn the sting of slavery.
[6]Barclay,
100.
[7]Warren
Wiersbe. The Bible Exposition Commentary. Vol. 1.
(Wheaton, Illinois: Victor Books, 1989), 605.
[8]Patricia
Grogan, et. al. Christian Community Bible: Catholic
Pastoral Edition. 27th Ed. (Philippines:
Claretian, 1999), 346.
[9]Grogan,
et. al.346.
[10]Flunder
mentions laborers, but not slaves.
[11]Grogan,
et. al.346.
[12]Wiersbe,
605.
[13]Matthew
25:40.
[14]Leon
Morris. Tyndale New Testament Commentaries: 1
Corinthians. (Leicester, England: Inter-Varsity Press,
1983), 158.
[15]Flunder.
[16]Flunder.
[17]Flunder.
[18]Alberta
Barnes.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible. e-Sword. (Software Program.
Franklin, TN: Equipping Ministries Foundation, 2000)
www.e-sword.net.
[19]Flunder
talks about waiting on those who are on a different theological
plane.
[20]Flunder.
|